Green Screen - Deer and Rabbit Repellent
A Simple and Effective Way to Discourage Wildlife Damage

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Scott R. Winterstein, Ph.D
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife
Michigan State University
East Lansing, Michigan

May 13, 1997
This report outlines the results of an efficacy test of Green Screen, a product of Envirodyne, Inc. as a white-tailed deer repellent. The field experiments were conducted by Eric Grinstern under the direction of Dr. Glenn Dudderar (Associate Professor of Wildlife Biology, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University). All statistical analyses were conducted by Dr. Scott R. Winterstein (Associate Professor of Wildlife Biology, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University).


Field Trials
All field trials were conducted in an old field adjacent to a woodlot on the Michigan State University campus. While there are a number of fences in this portion of the campus, they are not high enough to impede white-tailed deer movements and deer are free to roam. Twelve experimental plots were established by clearing an area of approximately 2.5 x 2.5 feet of all vegetation. Plots were spaced at about 10 to 12 foot intervals. Cracked corn was used as bait to attract deer to the plots. Each plot was baited with 2- 3 cups of corn which was periodically replenished for about three weeks prior to application of the repellent. By the time the repellent was applied, all twelve plots were each being visited by 2 - 5 deer in a three-day period.

To initiate the experiment, on November 17, 1995, repellent was placed in six of the twelve plots (the Treated plots); the remaining six plots (the Untreated plots) did not receive any repellent. The repellent was applied to the plots by attaching a bag of Green Screen about 1 foot above ground level to a 2 foot long stick placed in the center of the treated plots. Every third day the plots were checked. The number of approaches to each plot was measured by counting the number of distinct sets of deer tracks in the cleared area. After counting the tracks, the plot was raked to remove old tracks and 2 – 3 cups of corn was added to the plot.

Results
The number of times white-tailed deer approached each plot, followed the initial application of Green Screen on November 17, is presented in Table 1. Figures 1 and 2 show the total number of approaches to the Treated and Untreated plots per observation period and the average number of approaches to the Treated and Untreated plots per observation period, respectively. The results can be summarized as follows:
Over the course of the study, Treated plots were approached by white-tailed deer only 10 times, while Untreated plots were approached 95 times.

  • On average, over the 18 day length of the experiment, each Untreated plot was approached 1.7 times or about 0.09 times per day. Or stated another way, on average each Treated plot would be approached by 1 white-tailed deer about once every 11 days.
  • On average, over the 18 day length of the experiment, each Untreated plot was approached 15.8 times or about 0.88 times per day. Or state another way, on average each Untreated plot would be approached by 1 white-tailed deer about once every 27 hours.
  • On average, Untreated plots were over 9 times more likely to be approached by white-tailed deer on any given day than were Treated plots.
  • The study was conducted for six 3-day observation periods and there were six Treated plots and six Untreated plots. This in effect results in 36 Treated plots that could be visited by white-tailed deer and 36 Untreated plots that could be visited by White-tailed deer. Only 17% (6 of 36) of the Treated plots were approached by the deer, while 94% of the Untreated plots were approached by deer.
  • The number of white-tailed deer approaching Untreated plots was significantly higher than the number approaching Treated plots (Chi Square test, P <0.001).
  • The number of Untreated plots approached by white-tailed was significantly higher than the number of Treated plots approached (Chi Square test, P <0.001).
  • Untreated plots were significantly more likely to be approached by white-tailed deer on each observation day expect 11/20, the first observation day after the repellent was applied (Kruskal – Wallis test)

Table 1. Number of times deer approached each plot per 3-day observation period.
Observation Period

Plot Number
11/20
11/23
11/26
11/29
12/2
12/5
Treated 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Treated 2
2
0
0
0
0
0
Treated 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Treated 4
2
0
0
0
0
0
Treated 5
1
1
0
0
0
0
Treated 6
3
0
0
0
1
0
Total
8
1
0
0
1
0
Average
1.33
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.00
 
Untreated 1
0
2
3
4
1
2
Untreated 2
3
1
2
3
4
4
Untreated 3
6
2
3
2
1
2
Untreated 4
3
1
2
3
0
3
Untreated 5
3
1
2
3
2
6
Untreated 6
5
4
1
4
3
4
Total
20
11
13
19
11
21
Average
3.33
1.83
2.17
3.17
1.83
3.50
 


 

 

Home | Products | History | MSU Study | Comparison | Buy Online | Contact Us

PO Box 451
Manistee, MI 49660
1-800-968-9453
Developed by Educating-U
Copyright © 2006 - All Rights Reserved